Inside Russia and USA’s arsenal of 13,000 nukes from Satan II to Minuteman III rockets that could obliterate the world

Share to friends

VLADIMIR Putin’s nuclear sabre rattling has left the world as quickly as as soon as extra going by way of the prospect of a battle that could annihilate the planet.

This week the tyrant ordered his forces to simulate a “massive nuclear strike” in response to a nuke assault on its soil and, in accordance to a Russian colonel, rehearsed wiping Britain and the US off the map.

AFP

Putin has beforehand bragged he’ll use nuclear weapons in opposition to the West if anyone interferes in Ukraine[/caption]

Newsflash

The launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile all through the teaching of Russian forces[/caption]

The practice is a chilling reminder that both aspect have massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons, primed to unleash Armageddon.

In response, the Pentagon has been ending up its private missile assessments and is thought to be planning to retailer an upgraded mannequin of the bombs it retailers in Europe.

Putin has beforehand bragged he’ll use nuclear weapons against the West if anyone interferes in Ukraine.

And fears are rising that he is escalating the threat as his botched invasion drags on into its ninth month.

READ MORE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS

FIRE AND FURY

US rushes hypersonic missile tests & upgrades nukes after Putin’s WW3 drills

STAR WARS

How China plots to use nukes to blast spacecraft and cripple Elon Musk’s Starlink

Disaster expert Paul Ingram has laid out the carnage that would ensue if Mad Vlad have been to carry by way of alongside along with his menace.

He instructed The Sun the “blast and radiation would lead to casualties of 200 to 300million worldwide”.

Ingram, from the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at the University of Cambridge, moreover warned of apocalyptic aftershocks from any nuclear battle.

“On top of the immediate deaths, the all-out nuclear exchange would throw up so much radioactive soot that it would obscure the sun for several years,” he talked about.


“This would lead to the deaths of up to five billion people worldwide.”

If have been to carry out his menace, the Russian tyrant has at his disposal a terrifying arsenal of spherical 6,000 warheads.

In comparability, the US has 5,428 whereas France has 290 and the UK has 225.

Each warhead is itself a mini-nuclear bomb and a quantity of are sometimes packed into each weapon.

Every warhead in trendy nuclear weapons have an explosive power many events that of atomic bombs that flattened the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The weapons that are probably to be fired in opposition to Western cities can be found the sort of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM), missiles fired from submarines and these launched from warplanes.

Russia moreover has tactical weapons that are used on the battlefield or fired from torpedoes.

Russia’s main ICBM has the suitably chilling title of Satan-2 and has then high of a 14-storey tower block.

The 208 ton missile is succesful of inserting targets at just about 16,000mph and can hit the UK inside 20 minutes.

READ ALSO  Guilty: A former Capitol police officer was convicted on a charge he obstructed the January 6 investigation

Also of their armoury is the Kinzhal hypersonic missile that’s launched from planes and can carry every nuclear and typical warheads.

Just how extremely efficient are nuclear weapons?

The power of a nuclear weapon is measured the equal amount of TNT needed to produce the an identical explosion.

American bombs that have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had yields of 15 and 21 kilotons, respectively, so equal to 15,000 tons and 21,000 tons of TNT.

Compared to these bombs, trendy strategic nuclear weapons have enormous power.

Standard ones can have yields of 500 kilotons, 800 kilotons and even 1 megaton, equal to 1 million tons of TNT.

Russia holds the file for the strongest weapon ever exploded.

In 1961, it examined a bomb of at least 50 megatons, nicknamed ‘Tsar Bomba’ or the ruler of all bombs.

Russia has boasted that the missile is “unstoppable” and it was unleased on Ukraine in the early days of the Ukraine battle.

But launching such weapons would come with an infinite amount of hazard for Putin. 

Meanwhile, the mainstay of the US ICBM stress is the Minuteman III, which dates once more to the Cold War.

There are spherical 400 of the missiles in the US inventory and could also be managed from airborne command posts in the event of battle.

Its seaborne nuclear forces are carried in the US Navy’s Ohio Class long-range submarines, referred to as boomers.

They are stealthy and can launch nuclear missile strikes and are thought of a key strategic deterrent.

The submarines are equipped with Trident II D-5 missiles and are break up between bases at Bangor, Washington, and King’s Bay, Georgia

They represents one leg of the US nuclear “triad,” along with the Air Force’s long-range B-2 and B-52 bombers, which carry nuclear succesful cruise missiles.

The US isn’t the solely Western nation with nuclear weapons that could hit once more at Putin.

The UK has 4 Trident submarines with spherical 20O warheads.

All of the submarines are famously issued with a “letter of last resort“, written by the prime minister and detailing what to do if Britain is devastated by a nuclear assault.

READ ALSO  Charity clothing stores turn to Depop and Instagram as they head upmarket with vintage and designer items

We are significantly better prepared for cyberattacks than we’re for nuclear battle


Taras YoungAuthor of Apocalypse Ready

The current estimated dimension of the French arsenal is 290 warheads.

Its nuclear weapons are carried on Rafale fighter aircraft primarily based totally on land and aircraft carriers and 4 Triomphant-class nuclear submarines.

China, France, Pakistan, India, Israel and North Korea make up the world’s completely different nuclear powers.

Science journal Nature Food launched a paper in August analyzing the potential outcomes of a nuclear battle between two nations.

The paper found that even a restricted nuclear battle throughout which two nations unleash weapons on each other could set off worldwide famine.

“A large per cent of the people will be starving,” native climate scientist Lili Xia from Rutgers University in New Jersey talked about. “It’s really bad.”

The paper used parallels akin to forest fires to model the climatic outcomes of a quantity of nuclear explosions over cities.

Scientists analysed six battle conditions, each of which could pump completely completely different portions of radioactive soot into the ambiance.

Each state of affairs would reduce flooring temperatures anyplace between 1C to 16C, whereas the outcomes could linger on for higher than a decade or so.

Taras Young, creator of Nuclear War in the UK and Apocalypse Ready, instructed The Sun Online: “Nuclear war isn’t survivable.”

Read More on The Sun

I-RARE

Apple releases special iPhone that only certain people are allowed to own

DI-WOW

I’m a mum-of-4 & I gave my council home a glow-up on a budget

He added: “We are significantly better prepared for cyberattacks than we’re for nuclear battle. We have the National Cybersecurity Centre.

“Education is key. The government needs to do more to educate people on the threats out there.”

AP

Putin oversaw present chilling drills remotely[/caption]

Reuters

A missile was moreover seen being fired from a submarine[/caption]

Russian navy personnel in the missile administration
Reuters

Putin at a training centre for mobilised reservists[/caption]

Go to Source